m***@facts.only.now
2012-10-28 19:34:30 UTC
Romney All Wet on Ships
The Romney campaign is moving full steam ahead with a new radio ad
that repeats a misleading debate claim by Romney that the size of the
Navys fleet is the smallest it has been since 1917. The number of
ships is actually up a bit since 2007 under President George W. Bush.
Moreover, Navy officials say its silly to compare the size of the
fleet in 1917 with that of today, because the mission and capabilities
of todays nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines
are vastly different than that of the gunboats and coal-powered
dreadnaughts of 1917, when the shift to oil power was just starting.
The radio ad is running in Florida and Virginia both are swing
states but also big ship-building states. The newest nuclear-powered
carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is currently under construction in
Newport New Shipbuilding in Virginia, for example.
The radio ads use an edited version of Romneys comments during the
third and final presidential debate: Our Navy now is smaller than any
time since 1917. The Navy said they needed 313 ships to carry out
their mission; were now down to 285. Thats unacceptable to me.
There were 342 total active ships as of April 6, 1917, when the U.S.
entered World War I (the number stood at 245 in December 1916). And
there were 282 active duty ships as of April 2012, according to a
Congressional Research Service report in August. Thats down slightly
from the Naval History and Heritage Commands count of 285 as of
September 2011. However, 282 ships is the same number in service
during George W. Bushs last year in office, and a slight increase
over the number in 2007 278 when the size of the fleet was at its
lowest since the early 20th century.
The Romney campaign is moving full steam ahead with a new radio ad
that repeats a misleading debate claim by Romney that the size of the
Navys fleet is the smallest it has been since 1917. The number of
ships is actually up a bit since 2007 under President George W. Bush.
Moreover, Navy officials say its silly to compare the size of the
fleet in 1917 with that of today, because the mission and capabilities
of todays nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines
are vastly different than that of the gunboats and coal-powered
dreadnaughts of 1917, when the shift to oil power was just starting.
The radio ad is running in Florida and Virginia both are swing
states but also big ship-building states. The newest nuclear-powered
carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is currently under construction in
Newport New Shipbuilding in Virginia, for example.
The radio ads use an edited version of Romneys comments during the
third and final presidential debate: Our Navy now is smaller than any
time since 1917. The Navy said they needed 313 ships to carry out
their mission; were now down to 285. Thats unacceptable to me.
There were 342 total active ships as of April 6, 1917, when the U.S.
entered World War I (the number stood at 245 in December 1916). And
there were 282 active duty ships as of April 2012, according to a
Congressional Research Service report in August. Thats down slightly
from the Naval History and Heritage Commands count of 285 as of
September 2011. However, 282 ships is the same number in service
during George W. Bushs last year in office, and a slight increase
over the number in 2007 278 when the size of the fleet was at its
lowest since the early 20th century.